New York State Regents ELA Part 2 Rubric - Writing From Sources / Argument

New York State Regents ELA Part 2 Rubric - Writing From Sources / Argument

4 min read May 19, 2024
✨ Summary: Argumentative Writing Rubric for NY Regents ELA exam. Comprehensive scoring guidelines for source-based arguments.

New York State Regents Argumentative Writing Rubric

Key Points

  • This rubric guides assessment of argumentative essays on the NY Regents ELA exam
  • It evaluates four main criteria: content/analysis, evidence, organization, and conventions
  • It uses a 1-6 scoring scale with detailed performance descriptors
  • It specifically focuses on argument writing using multiple sources

Full Rubric

ScoreContent and AnalysisCommand of EvidenceCoherence, Organization, and StyleControl of Conventions
6- Introduce precise and insightful claim- Demonstrate in-depth analysis of texts- Present ideas fully and thoughtfully- Use wide range of specific evidence- Exhibit skillful organization- Use sophisticated language- Control conventions with essentially no errors
5- Introduce precise and thoughtful claim- Demonstrate thorough analysis- Present ideas clearly and accurately- Use effective specific evidence- Exhibit logical organization- Use fluent and precise language- Control conventions with occasional errors
4- Introduce precise claim- Demonstrate appropriate analysis- Present ideas sufficiently- Use adequate specific evidence- Exhibit acceptable organization- Use precise language- Demonstrate partial control
3- Introduce reasonable claim- Demonstrate some analysis- Present ideas briefly- Use some relevant evidence- Exhibit some organization- Use primarily basic language- Demonstrate emerging control
2- Introduce claim- Demonstrate confused analysis- Present ideas inconsistently- Use irrelevant evidence- Exhibit inconsistent organization- Use inappropriate language- Demonstrate lack of control
1- Do not introduce claim- Do not demonstrate analysis- Present little or no evidence- Exhibit little organization- Use incoherent language- Are minimal

Detailed Rubric Breakdown

Content and Analysis

ScoreCriteria
6- Introduce precise and insightful claim as directed by task- Demonstrate in-depth analysis to distinguish from alternate claims
5- Introduce precise and thoughtful claim- Demonstrate thorough analysis to distinguish from alternate claims
4- Introduce precise claim- Demonstrate appropriate analysis to distinguish from alternate claims
3- Introduce reasonable claim- Demonstrate some analysis but insufficiently distinguish from alternate claims
2- Introduce claim- Demonstrate confused analysis failing to distinguish from alternate claims
1- Do not introduce claim- Do not demonstrate analysis of texts

Command of Evidence

ScoreCriteria
6- Present ideas fully with highly effective evidence- Demonstrate proper citation of sources
5- Present ideas clearly with effective evidence- Demonstrate proper citation
4- Present ideas sufficiently with adequate evidence- Demonstrate proper citation
3- Present ideas briefly with some evidence- Demonstrate inconsistent citation
2- Present ideas inconsistently with irrelevant evidence- Demonstrate little use of citations
1- Present little or no evidence- Do not make use of citations

Coherence, Organization, and Style

ScoreCriteria
6- Exhibit skillful organization- Use sophisticated language and structure
5- Exhibit logical organization- Use fluent and precise language
4- Exhibit acceptable organization- Use precise and appropriate language
3- Exhibit some organization- Use primarily basic language
2- Exhibit inconsistent organization- Lack formal style
1- Exhibit little organization- Use predominantly incoherent language

Control of Conventions

ScoreCriteria
6- Demonstrate control with essentially no errors
5- Demonstrate control with occasional errors only
4- Demonstrate partial control with occasional errors
3- Demonstrate emerging control with errors
2- Demonstrate lack of control with frequent errors
1- Are minimal, making assessment unreliable

How to Use This Rubric

  1. For Teachers: Use to assess students’ argumentative writing skills and their ability to effectively use source materials.

  2. For Students: Use as a guide when writing arguments. Ensure you address all four criteria for comprehensive argumentative writing.

  3. For Test Prep: Understand expectations for each score level to target improvements.

Tips for Success in Regents Argument Writing

  1. Strong Claim: Develop a precise, insightful claim that addresses the task.

  2. Evidence Integration: Support arguments with specific evidence from provided texts.

  3. Clear Organization: Create a cohesive essay with logical progression of ideas.

  4. Sophisticated Style: Use formal language and varied sentence structure.

  5. Source Citation: Properly cite sources to avoid plagiarism.

  6. Counter-Arguments: Address and distinguish from alternate or opposing claims.

  7. Proper Conventions: Maintain control of grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

Important Notes

  • Essays addressing fewer texts than required score no higher than 3
  • Personal responses with minimal text reference score no higher than 1
  • Completely copied responses receive a 0
  • Responses unrelated to task/illegible receive a 0

Regular practice with this rubric will help students develop strong argumentative writing skills for the Regents exam. Remember to address all components and maintain focus on developing a well-supported argument using the provided sources.